25
Using Array.reduce With Objects
This article will demonstrate a few ways that you can use JavaScript's Array.reduce
method to transform objects.
Let's take a quick look at how Array.reduce
works. You can skip this if you're already familiar with it.
Array.reduce
reduces an array down to a single value. The resulting value can be of any type — it does not have to be an array. This is one way in which Array.reduce
differs from other array methods like map
and filter
. Here's a reduce statement that returns the sum of an array of numbers:
const numbers = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5];
const sum = numbers.reduce((next, number) => {
return next + number;
}, 0);
Array.reduce
accepts two arguments:
- A callback function that is executed for each item in the array in series and receives the following parameters:
- The accumulator (called
next
in the example), which is the working value. In the first iteration the accumulator is set to the initial value (0
). For all subsequent iterations it's the value returned by the previous iteration. - The current array item (
number
in the example). - The current array index (not used in the example).
- The array that is being reduced (not used in the example).
- The accumulator (called
- The initial value for the accumulator. In Example 1, the initial value is
0
.
The reduce statement in Example 1
will execute the callback function five times with the following values:
-
Accumulator (
next
):0
(the initial value); Value (number
):1
; Returns:1
; -
Accumulator:
1
; Value:2
; Returns:3
; -
Accumulator:
3
; Value:3
; Returns:6
; -
Accumulator:
6
; Value:4
; Returns:10
; -
Accumulator:
10
; Value:5
; Returns:15
;
The final value of sum
will be 15
.
Remember that Array.reduce
can use initial and return values of any type, which makes it very flexible. Let's explore how we can use it to perform some common tasks with plain objects.
Developers frequently have to look up a value in one array using a value from another array. Consider the following hypothetical example where we have an array of objects representing users and another array representing profiles. Each user has an id
property and each profile has a userId
property. We need to match each user with their profile, where user.id
equals profile.userId
. A basic implementation of this is shown in Example 2.
const users = [
{ id: 1, email: '[email protected]' },
{ id: 2, email: '[email protected]' },
{ id: 3, email: '[email protected]' },
];
const profiles = [
{ userId: 1, firstName: 'Danielle', lastName: 'Contreras' },
{ userId: 2, firstName: 'Alfredas', lastName: 'Fehér' },
{ userId: 3, firstName: 'Orpheus', lastName: 'De Jong' },
];
const usersWithProfiles = users.map((user) => {
const profile = profiles.find((profile) => (user.id === profile.userId));
return { ...user, profile };
});
// usersWithProfiles:
// [
// { id: 1, email: '[email protected]', profile: { userId: 1, firstName: 'Danielle', lastName: 'Contreras' } },
// { id: 2, email: '[email protected]', profile: { userId: 2, firstName: 'Alfredas', lastName: 'Fehér' } },
// { id: 3, email: '[email protected]', profile: { userId: 3, firstName: 'Orpheus', lastName: 'De Jong' } },
// ]
The problem with Example 2 is that it uses Array.find
inside Array.map
which is inefficient. This might not matter for the short arrays in the example, but it will become more of a problem when working with longer arrays. The longer the profiles
array is, the longer the potential lookup time will be for any given profile. We can solve this problem by transforming the profiles
array into an object beforehand, using the userId
property as the key:
const users = [
{ id: 1, email: '[email protected]' },
{ id: 2, email: '[email protected]' },
{ id: 3, email: '[email protected]' },
];
const profiles = [
{ userId: 1, firstName: 'Danielle', lastName: 'Contreras' },
{ userId: 2, firstName: 'Alfredas', lastName: 'Fehér' },
{ userId: 3, firstName: 'Orpheus', lastName: 'De Jong' },
];
// Transform the profiles into an object keyed by the userId:
const profilesByUserId = profiles.reduce((next, profile) => {
const { userId } = profile;
return { ...next, [userId]: profile };
}, {});
// profilesByUserId:
// {
// 1: { userId: 1, firstName: 'Danielle', lastName: 'Contreras' },
// 2: { userId: 2, firstName: 'Alfredas', lastName: 'Fehér' },
// 3: { userId: 3, firstName: 'Orpheus', lastName: 'De Jong' },
// }
// Look up the profiles by id:
const usersWithProfiles = users.map((user) => {
return { ...user, profile: profilesByUserId[user.id] };
});
// usersWithProfiles:
// [
// { id: 1, email: '[email protected]', profile: { userId: 1, firstName: 'Danielle', lastName: 'Contreras' } },
// { id: 2, email: '[email protected]', profile: { userId: 2, firstName: 'Alfredas', lastName: 'Fehér' } },
// { id: 3, email: '[email protected]', profile: { userId: 3, firstName: 'Orpheus', lastName: 'De Jong' } },
// ]
Example 3 produces the same result as Example 2 but will be much faster with long arrays.
Sometimes you need a copy of an object that only includes certain properties from the original object, or that omits certain properties. This is a great use case for Array.reduce
.
// Copy an object, retaining allowed properties:
const person = {
firstName: 'Orpheus',
lastName: 'De Jong',
phone: '+1 123-456-7890',
email: '[email protected]',
};
const allowedProperties = ['firstName', 'lastName'];
const allKeys = Object.keys(person);
const result = allKeys.reduce((next, key) => {
if (allowedProperties.includes(key)) {
return { ...next, [key]: person[key] };
} else {
return next;
}
}, {});
// result:
// { firstName: 'Orpheus', lastName: 'De Jong' }
Example 4 reduces the keys from the person
object into a new object that only contains the properties whose keys are included in the allowedProperties
array. If you add a new property to the person
object it will not appear in the result unless you also add the property name to the allowed properties.
// Copy an object, excluding disallowed properties:
const person = {
firstName: 'Orpheus',
lastName: 'De Jong',
phone: '+1 123-456-7890',
email: '[email protected]',
};
const disallowedProperties = ['phone', 'email'];
const allKeys = Object.keys(person);
const result = allKeys.reduce((next, key) => {
if (!disallowedProperties.includes(key)) {
return { ...next, [key]: person[key] };
} else {
return next;
}
}, {});
// result:
// { firstName: 'Orpheus', lastName: 'De Jong' }
Example 5 reduces the keys from the person
object into a new object that only contains the properties whose keys are not included in the disallowedProperties
array. If you add a new property to the person
object it will appear in the result unless you also add the property name to the disallowed properties. If you want to ensure that only certain properties will be included in the result, Example 4 is a better choice, but Example 5 is useful when you only need to ensure that certain properties will never included.
We can also create generic functions for the reduce statements in examples 4 and 5:
const filterAllowedObjectProperties = (obj, allowedProperties = []) => {
return Object.keys(obj).reduce((next, key) => {
if (allowedProperties.includes(key)) {
return { ...next, [key]: obj[key] };
} else {
return next;
}
}, {});
}
const filterDisallowedObjectProperties = (obj, disallowedProperties = []) => {
return Object.keys(obj).reduce((next, key) => {
if (!disallowedProperties.includes(key)) {
return { ...next, [key]: obj[key] };
} else {
return next;
}
}, {});
}
Another common task is to merge an object with another object that contains fallback, or default values for some properties. Sometimes you can do this simply by using object spread, but this can have unexpected consequences when you have null or empty properties:
const obj1 = {
key1: 'value 1.1',
key2: null,
key3: 'value 1.3',
key4: ''
};
const obj2 = {
key1: 'value 2.1',
key2: 'value 2.2',
key3: 'value 2.3',
key4: 'value 2.4',
key5: 'value 2.5'
};
const result = { ...obj2, ...obj1 };
// result:
// {
// key1: 'value 2.1',
// key2: null,
// key3: 'value 2.3',
// key4: '',
// key5: 'value 2.5'
// };
Example 7 creates a new object containing the properties from obj2
overridden by the properties from obj1
. Therefore, the values from obj2
serve as fallback or defaults for the values from obj1
. Notice that the result retains the null
and empty string values from obj1
. That happens because null
and an empty string are both defined values. We probably didn't want this result but Array.reduce
offers a solution.
const obj1 = {
key1: 'value 1.1',
key2: null,
key3: 'value 1.3',
key4: ''
};
const obj2 = {
key1: 'value 2.1',
key2: 'value 2.2',
key3: 'value 2.3',
key4: 'value 2.4',
key5: 'value 2.5'
};
// Spread the keys from both objects into an array.
const allKeys = [ ...Object.keys(obj1), ...Object.keys(obj2) ];
// Convert the array of keys to a set to remove duplicate values,
// then spread the unique values into a new array.
const uniqueKeys = [ ...new Set(allKeys) ];
// Reduce the unique keys into a new object containing the value
// for each key from obj1, falling back to the value from obj2 if
// obj1[key] is falsey.
const result = uniqueKeys.reduce((next, key) => {
const value = obj1[key] || obj2[key];
return { ...next, [key]: value };
}, {});
// result:
// {
// key1: 'value 1.1',
// key2: 'value 2.2',
// key3: 'value 1.3',
// key4: 'value 2.4',
// key5: 'value 2.5',
// }
Note that Example 8 uses a naive strategy to decide when to use the fallback value. The fallback value (obj2[key]
) is used if the preferred value (obj1[key]
) is falsey. That means undefined
, null
, an empty string, 0
or false
. This may not be appropriate for all cases, since any of these values might be acceptable in your application. Revise the fallback condition as necessary. For example, replacing const value = obj1[key] || obj2[key];
with const value = (obj1[key] !== undefined && obj1[key] !== null) ? obj1[key] : obj2[key];
will ensure that the fallback value is only used when the preferred value is undefined
or null
.
Finally, let's look at another very common task that developers often use a third party library to accomplish: parsing search strings (sometimes called query strings). Modern web browsers provide URLSearchParams to make quick work of this, but maybe you aren't writing code for a browser, or you have to support Internet Explorer, or you just want to try doing it yourself because that's how we learn. Whatever your reason, Array.reduce
is your friend.
First, we need a search string. You might get this directly from window.location.search
in a browser or by parsing an URL. If you use React and react-router you might use the useLocation
hook:
`const { search = '' } = useLocation();`
However you get the search string, you'll need to prepare it first:
// Get a search string:
const search = '?key1=value%201&key2=value%202&key3=value%203';
// Remove the leading '?':
const query = search.replace(/^\?/, '');
// Split the string on the ampersand to create an array of key-value strings:
const pairs = query.split('&');
// pairs:
// [ 'key1=value%201', 'key2=value%202', 'key3=value%203' ];
Next, reduce the key-value strings into an object by splitting them on the equals sign. The string before =
is the key and the remainder is the value. The value needs to be decoded with decodeURIComponent
.
const params = pairs.reduce((next, pair) => {
const [ key, value ] = pair.split('=');
const decodedValue = decodeURIComponent(value);
return { ...next, [key]: decodedValue };
}, {});
// params:
// {
// key1: 'value 1',
// key2: 'value 2',
// key3: 'value 3',
// }
The parser in Example 9a/9b will do the job in many cases, but it's incomplete. Search strings can contain multiple values for each key, and this parser will only retain the last value for each key. Let's fix that.
const search = '?key1=value%201&key2=value%202&key3=value%203.1&key3=value%203.2&key3=value%203.3';
const query = search.replace(/^\?/, '');
const pairs = query.split('&');
const params = pairs.reduce((next, pair) => {
const [ key, value ] = pair.split('=');
const decodedValue = decodeURIComponent(value);
const previousValue = next[key];
let nextValue;
if (previousValue !== undefined) {
if (Array.isArray(previousValue)) {
nextValue = [ ...previousValue, decodedValue ];
} else {
nextValue = [ previousValue, decodedValue ];
}
} else {
nextValue = decodedValue;
}
return { ...next, [key]: nextValue };
}, {});
// params:
// {
// key1: 'value 1',
// key2: 'value 2',
// key3: [ 'value 3.1', 'value 3.2', 'value 3.3' ],
// }
Example 10 prepares the search string exactly the same way as Example 9a. The difference is how the reduce callback handles the value for each key. Here's a step by step breakdown of the callback function:
- The key-value string (
pair
) is split on=
to get separate strings for the key and value. - The value is decoded with
decodeURIComponent
. - The accumulator (
next
) is checked to determine if there is a previous value for the key. - If there is a previous value (
previousValue !== undefined
) it is checked to determine whether it's an array. - If the previous value is an array, the decoded value is appended to it. (
nextValue = [ ...previousValue, decodedValue ];
) If the previous value isn't an array, a new array is created containing the previous and decoded values. (nextValue = [ previousValue, decodedValue ];
) - If there is no previous value, the next value is set to the decoded value. (
nextValue = decodedValue;
)
The resulting params
object contains string values for key1
and key2
, and an array containing the three strings for key3
in the order in which they appeared in the search string.
Like we did in Example 1, we can clarify the process by examining the state of each iteration:
-
Accumulator (
next
):{}
(the initial value); Value (pair
):'key1=value%201
; Returns:{ key1: 'value 1' }
; -
Accumulator:
{ key1: 'value 1' }
; Value:'key2=value%202
; Returns:{ key1: 'value 1', key2: 'value 2' }
; -
Accumulator:
{ key1: 'value 1', key2: 'value 2' }
; Value:'key3=value%203.1
; Returns:{ key1: 'value 1', key2: 'value 2', key3: 'value 3.1' }
; -
Accumulator:
{ key1: 'value 1', key2: 'value 2', key3: 'value 3.1' }
; Value:'key3=value%203.2
; Returns:{ key1: 'value 1', key2: 'value 2', key3: ['value 3.1', 'value 3.2'] }
; -
Accumulator:
{ key1: 'value 1', key2: 'value 2', key3: ['value 3.1', 'value 3.2'] }
; Value:'key3=value%203.3
; Returns:{ key1: 'value 1', key2: 'value 2', key3: ['value 3.1', 'value 3.2', 'value 3.3'] }
;
Array.reduce
is sort of a Swiss army knife that you can use to solve a wide variety of problems. I encourage you to explore it and try applying it in situations you might not have considered.
25